Tag Archives: Black history

Trump is a Criminal, But the Democrats Belong to the Same Mafia

15 Jan

Glen Ford, BAR executive editor 09 Jan 2020

 

Trump is a Criminal, But the Democrats Belong to the Same Mafia

 

The Republicans and Democrats are united under the American imperial banner, and only differ on details of strategy to maintain Washington’s global domination.

None can be free of the scourge of war – the ultimate crime against humanity, from which all others flow – while the warmakers are in power in the Citadel of Capital.”

The grievously wronged Iranians have apparently fired a purposely harmless salvo of missiles into several U.S.-occupied bases in Iraq to avenge last Friday ’s U.S. drone assassination of Revolutionary Guards commander Qassi Suleimani. Although the Fars news agency  claimed, for Iranian popular consumption, that “at least 80 US armed personnel have been killed and around 200 others wounded,” American and other NATO forces in Iraq report no casualties, giving Trump an opportunity to claim victory and back off from further aggressions. Trump followed the Iranian lead, holding a press conference  to dance away from continued armed hostilities, on Wednesday.

Since there is no “peace party” with any influence on governance in the United States, a U.S. retreat from Armageddon is the most that the world can hope for, in the near term. Trump’s mafia-style hit on the revered Iranian general – yet another Nuremburg-level U.S. crime against peace and humanity, for which death by hanging is the historical punishment – seemed designed to set the stage for a reprise of George Bush’s 2003 “Shock and Awe” demonstration of U.S. imperial firepower, this time with an orange tinge.

“A U.S. retreat from Armageddon is the most that the world can hope for, in the near term.”

 

glendc20blacks20against20syrian20invasion

 

Iranian national pride required a pantomimed military response, but the U.S. has provoked a far worse punishment by the Iraqis, on whose territory Suleimani was ambushed. The Iraqi parliament swiftly voted 170-0 to kick the 5,000 US troops out of their country, an exodus that would render Washington’s foothold in neighboring Syria untenable, thus sealing the fate of the remaining U.S.-backed al-Qaida “rebels” holed up in Idlib province and hastening the demise of ISIS forces currently shielded from Russian air attack by U.S. firepower. Donald Trump, who (correctly, but incoherently) charged Barack Obama with “founding ” ISIS, may well have fast-forwarded the definitive end of the U.S.-Islamic jihadist presence in Syria and Iraq.

Not that this was Trump’s intention. The Republicans and Democrats are united under the American imperial banner, and only differ on details of strategy to maintain Washington’s global domination. As BAR contributing editor Danny Haiphong writes, “There may be two political parties in the United States, but there is only one ruling class agenda.”

“Trump may well have fast-forwarded the definitive end of the U.S.-Islamic jihadist presence in Syria and Iraq.”

Yet there is a profound split in the U.S. ruling class – not about the necessity to preserve the empire, on which there is no debate among the rulers, but over how Washington should manage relations with its junior imperial partners in Europe and elsewhere, and over the modalities of One Percent governance within the United States. On foreign policy, the Democrats have since 2016 positioned themselves as the more aggressive War Party, constantly goading Trump to attack Russia and its Syrian ally and to “stand up” to North Korea, to prove he is not a “dupe” of Vladimir Putin. As the party of Barack Obama, the previous Super-Sanctioner of rebellious nations, the Democrats are vicious in maligning Venezuela. And as the party of Hillary Clinton (“We came, We saw, He died – Ha Ha Ha.”), the Democrats have killed hundreds of thousands in U.S.-directed and financed jihadist wars in Libya and Syria. They are the puppeteers and paymasters of terror on a scale that Donald Trump has yet to match, an orgy of sectarian beheadings, torture, rape and mass murder that Trump’s assassination of General Suleimani may inadvertently bring to a close, with U.S. ouster from the region.

 

gkqeamg3hv321

 

“The Democrats have killed hundreds of thousands in U.S.-directed and financed jihadist wars in Libya and Syria.”

At home, the Democrats have spent the last three years constructing a New Cold War censorship of the Left, starting with Black Agenda Report and other radical web sites targeted only weeks after the 2016 election. As Black Alliance for Peace  national organizer (and BAR editor) Ajamu Baraka writes, the Democratic “opposition,” including the Democrat-leaning corporate media, is not anti-war – it’s anti-Trump. The Democrats, like their corporate and banking masters, are determined to preserve the neoliberal economic order – the global Race to the Bottom in which U.S. workers compete with super-exploited workers in the developing world. The only difference is that the Democrats would “integrate” the management of this dwindling wage economy through a policy of racial and ethnic “diversity.” Same downward destination, but with multi-colored overseers. Same police occupation of Black communities, and same racialized gaps in earnings and wealth for the masses of Blacks and browns – but rewards aplenty for the misleadership classes of the oppressed, whose job is to keep the social peace while oligarchs swallow society whole, as senior columnist Margaret Kimberley explains in this issue of BAR. Most of the Congressional Black Caucus joined other Democrats in awarding Trump yet another record-breaking military budget. Seventy-five percent of the Black Caucus voted to make police a protected class and assault on cops a federal crime, in 2018. Eighty-percent of the Black Caucus voted to keep the Pentagon’s 1033 program funneling military weapons and gear to local police departments, five years ago – and the Caucus has become even more reactionary and treacherous, since then.

“The Democrats would ‘integrate’ the management of this dwindling wage economy through a policy of racial and ethnic ‘diversity.’”

 

tensions

 

Although many of the issues have changed since Malcolm X’s day, Blacks remain locked into much the same power relationships as half a century ago. Malcolm’s “foxes” and “wolves” are still on the prowl:

“The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the ‘smiling’ fox. One is a wolf, the other is a fox. No matter what, they’ll both eat you.” — Malcolm X, 1963

There is one big difference in the political landscape, 57 years after Malcolm spoke those words. The “Black Misleadership Class” – a term coined at BAR and its predecessor, The Black Commentator – now plays a pivotal role in the electoral workings of the Democratic half of the corporate duopoly system of governance. As I explained, two years ago, the Black misleaders are:

“…those Black political forces that emerged at the end of the Sixties, eager to join the corporate and duopoly political (mostly Democrat) ranks, and to sell out the interests of the overwhelmingly working class Black masses in the process. It is both an actual and aspirational class, which ultimately sees its interests as tied to those of U.S. imperialism and its ruling circles. It seeks representation in the halls of corporate power, and dreads social transformation, which would upset the class’s carefully cultivated relationships with Power.”

“Malcolm’s ‘foxes’ and ‘wolves’ are still on the prowl.”

Blacks are still at the bottom, and racing deeper into the abyss. But an opportunistic sliver of the Black population has aligned with banksters and oligarchs in Democratic boardrooms. They join with corporate Democrats in screaming that Trump is the existential threat – not U.S. imperial wars, in which most Democrats are complicit; not the Race to the Bottom, which is as much a Democrat as Republican project; not the Mass Black Incarceration State, which is mainly enforced by urban Democratic regimes of all colors; and not capitalism, a system that was born, like the white settler United States, itself, in Native genocide and Black chattel slavery.

The Black Misleadership Class has no solidarity with anyone. They are hustlers, who have hijacked the aspirations of a proud, brave and independent-minded people – a people that have historically sought social justice and peace for not only themselves, but all mankind. That people needs a new party, with themselves in the leadership, a party that will Fight the Power. There is a world of allies out there, sharing the same aspirations. But none can be free of the scourge of war – the ultimate crime against humanity, from which all others flow – while the warmakers are in power in the Citadel of Capital.

 

fahrenheit-e14413812767444456

rise up - public domain picture

A redistribution of Wealth and Power is coming by Policy or by Pitchfork.  New & Used Revolutionary & Progressive Books, 60s-70s Memorabilia – Opposition Bookstore – https://www.facebook.com/Fahrenheit451bookstore/

 

The key to unlock all of our chains is right here, in the belly of the beast.

Power to the People!

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

 

On Rage, Reading Books and Other Necessities for the “Millennial Generation”

10 Jan

 

 

Danny Haiphong, BAR contributor 07 Nov 2018

Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.
Donate

Young people in the US are increasingly open to socialism and radical ideas, but less likely to study the science of revolutionary change.
“Neoliberal education and activism in the United States has infected young leftists with an aversion to books and study.”
Theory takes a break this week for a special message to young leftists. The Trump Administration has decried socialists as a threat to the United States. Both corporate parties have since 2016 been busy accusing left-leaning young people in this country of complicity in the rise of Trump and the fall of so-called “centrism.” The Democratic Party has worked overtime to move the attention of young leftists toward watered down “blue wave” candidates as the establishment attempts to ram through CIA and military intelligence officials into Congress in relative secrecy. It is no secret, however, that the US ruling class is concerned with the growing leftist views of the younger generation.

 

 

Polls have shown that so-called “millennials” view socialism in a positive light. Capitalism has failed them, even those white youth who believed that their parents had achieved the (white) American Dream. Millennials are poor. They work for low wages and have few opportunities to build wealth. Home ownership has fallen out of economic reach. Student debt is over a trillion dollars . Young Black Americans are terrorized by the police and forced to attend schools that funnel them into the prison regime . Young Latino Americans are terrorized by the deportation regime . In other words, US imperialism has little to offer a generation that sees no prospects for retirement and is often forced to choose between low-wage work or prison.
Young leftists also face a crisis of consciousness. While leftist ideas are on the rise, the reality remains that those labeled “millennials” know little to nothing about class struggle, Black liberation and anti-imperialism, or the fruits that prior movements won from struggle. After all, many of these fruits are disappearing by way of privatization, austerity, and state repression. Furthermore, the left is without an organized vehicle of the working class and oppressed. COINTELPRO lives on in the FBI’s “Black Identity Extremist” files. The general crisis of capitalism has developed many individual activists but few revolutionary organizations.
Of course, youth cannot be considered a class or an oppressed section of society in and of itself. There is great variance in the conditions that young people face depending on their relationship to the means of production and the ruling class structure. During the Obama era, some basic points of unity arose from the Black Lives Matter and Occupy Wall Street insurgencies. One, the police murder of Black Americans is an unjust manifestation of racism. Two, Wall Street has run amok and forced an entire generation into material hardship through student debt and other forms of parasitic finance. Much can be developed these two points of unity.
The ruling class has made sure that the era of Trump has arrested the development of a left insurgency through desperate attempts to invalidate and erase leftists. Bezos and the rest of the capitalist class concocted Russiagate from thin air to lay an imaginary basis for the claim that the radical left and the “alt” right are mere puppets of Putin’s campaign to destroy the United States. Trump has been given billions worth of airtime to scare young leftists back into the bosom of the so-called “moderates” of the corporate parties. The “moderate” ruling class promise two things and two things only: austerity and war. These promises represent the only possible fruits of impeaching Trump, regardless of what corporate media pundits have to say on the matter.
This doesn’t mean that young people should sympathize with Trump. However, Trump navel gazing should not be allowed to suppress the genuine class demands of the people. Class demands must be brought to the fore regardless of who is President. Questions such as healthcare, jobs, and war ultimately shape the growing rage among much of the population in the United States with the status quo. The job of the young generation is to study this rage, engage with this rage, and organize this rage.

 

 

Neoliberal education and activism in the United States has infected young leftists with an aversion to books and study. There are few opportunities for young people to learn history and politics from a revolutionary perspective. On college campuses, coursework tends to ascribe to neoliberal and for-profit imperatives. Professors are promoted based on the volume of research produced and the amount of money they make for institutions rather than the content of their work. Higher education institutions have always been openly hostile to radical ideas, purging professors who become too radical and viciously cutting Black Studies and other departments that were born from grassroots political struggle.
Young leftists seeking to avoid the mistakes of the past and the obstacles of the present must read books. They need to engage with revolutionary ideas just as much as they commit to on the ground struggle. Young leftists must drop the corporate ideology of “diversity” and replace it with the politics of power. They must reject the influence of the education system and the Democratic Party, two forces that have collaborated with the imperialist state to erase the history of revolutionary struggle from popular consciousness. This erasure has been complemented by the development of an anti-intellectual, counterrevolutionary political culture in the heartland of the United States Empire.
“Young leftists need to engage with revolutionary ideas just as much as they commit to on the ground struggle.”
I am twenty-eight and attend graduate school for social work, a profession with a long history of collaboration with the forces of social control and oppression in the imperialist world. Social work education speaks highly of its “social justice” roots but does little to teach social workers about the true history of the imperial context from which it practices. The profession leans on liberal notions of race and class as forms of “diversity.” As Black Agenda Report’s Glen Ford explained on Chris Hedges’ On Contact, diversity is a con that erases the complicity of the white liberal and Black misleader ship class in the reproduction of imperialist evils. Social work education has endorsed diversity because it has no answers for austerity, militarism, and the crisis of capitalism. Just like most academics who teach students to normalize imperialism, social workers are trained to further their careers by helping their “clients” adjust to increasingly horrid conditions.
Yet young leftists, even educated leftists, have few career options to further. Social work, for example, offers few economic incentives besides a job (if lucky) and thus must rely on the non-profit industrial complex’s obsession with values to distract from its social control function. Studying revolutionary theory and history is one way to combat the mundane and stagnant liberalism of the corporate academy. However, this must be done in conjunction with a search for political and organizational involvement. Here are some critical arenas of struggle that deserve more attention from young leftists:
“Study must be done in conjunction with a search for political and organizational involvement.”

 

 

Political prisoners: The United States warehouses dozens of political prisoners. Many of these prisoners served the people as leaders of the Black liberation movement of a generation ago. This includes Mumia Abu-Jamal, Leonard Peltier, and several members of the MOVE organization. Political prisoners suffer from a wide array of abuses from the prison regime. Without a movement, they will die in prison. Young leftists who are serious need to get involved in freeing all political prisoners. You can get started through the Jericho Movement here.
War: The U.S. spends trillions around the world to destabilize nations and make the world safe for corporate plunder. War is a permanent feature of a declining capitalist empire. Meanwhile, U.S. military spending not only terrorizes workers around the world but also loots the wages, social services, and taxes of workers in the U.S to pay for it. The Women’s March on the Pentagon that occurred earlier in October sought to unite the struggle for women’s rights in the U.S. with the cause of women around the world who are murdered and oppressed by U.S. warfare. The Black Alliance for Peace has been organizing to revive the Black Radical Tradition’s long history of solidarity with nations under siege from imperialism. Young leftists who are serious need to consider joining one or both efforts.
“Without a movement, political prisoners will die in prison.”
Labor: The age of austerity has decimated the labor movement. Many young leftists have never organized or joined a union. Union density is at an all-time low in the United States, which in part explains why wages have declined and poverty has risen over the last several decades. Unions may not offer a revolutionary solution to U.S. capitalism or imperialism, but they must be defended and (re)organized amid the fierce corporate assault against them. Workplaces must remain a primary site of struggle if the left is to ever wage a serious challenge to the capitalist and imperialist establishment.
Independent Media: The crisis of capitalism and imperialism is also a crisis of consciousness. A wave of “leftish” ideas has spread to younger people in the United States. Yet these ideas run the risk of dying at the altar of so-called liberal “identity” struggles born from the university or from the well-endowed graveyard of social movements, the Democratic Party. Young leftists must embrace independent left media like Black Agenda Report. They must create their own media and collaborate with existing independent media institutions to ensure that the ideological maturity of the working class and oppressed masses is given space to develop.
Whatever the case, young leftists must ultimately be drawn AWAY from Democratic Party electoral organizing. Instead, write, join an independent leftist organization, or organize a study group. Map your workplace. This is a difficult period, a period defined by crisis and stagnation. However, as Lenin stated, “there are decades where nothing happens and weeks where decades happen.” And as political and economic contradictions in the U.S. and globally become more acute, those weeks may be coming sooner than we think.

Danny Haiphong is an activist and journalist in the New York City area. He and Roberto Sirvent are co-authors of the forthcoming book entitled American Exceptionalism and American Innocence: A People’s History of Fake News- From the Revolutionary War to the War on Terror (Skyhorse Publishing). He can be reached at wakeupriseup1990@gmail.com.

 

“None are more helplessly enslaved than those that believe they are free.” Left Wing Books & 60s -70s Memorabilia – We Support the Yellow Vest Uprising – http://stores.ebay.com/fahrenheit451bookstore

 

 

 

 

The real History; Juana Azurduy de Padilla; Bolivian guerrilla fighter who fought against the Spanish rule in South America. International day of women’s rights

5 Mar

 

Juana Azurduy de Padilla was a Bolivian guerilla fighter who fought against the Spanish rule in South America. It was this day in 1816 that she along with 200 Indian women on horseback, defeated the Spanish troops in Bolivia.

Juana Azurduy Llanos (July 12, 1780 or 1781 – May 25, 1862) was a South American guerrilla military leader.

She was born on July 12, 1780 or 1781 in the town of Chuquisaca, Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata (now Sucre, Bolivia). She was Mestizo by ethnicity, meaning she was half Spanish and half indigenous. “Her mother married into a family of property” meaning she married into a more wealthy family. Her father, however, was killed by Spaniards, and the killer apparently got away without any repercussions. She grew up in Chuquisaca and at the age of 12 joined a convent to become a nun. She was then expelled at the age of 17 because she rebelled too often. She married Manuel Ascencio Padilla in 1805, a man who shared her love of the indigenous populations in Bolivia. She spoke Spanish and two South American languages: Quechua and Aymara. Juana Azurduy was born in Toroca, a town located in the Municipality of Potosí in the Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata (present-day town of Ravelo, Potosí Department, Bolivia) on July 12, 1780. Her parents were Don Matías Azurduy, a rich white owner of many properties and Doña Eulalia Bermudes, a chola from Chuquisaca.

Upon their return they raised an army and joined in the fighting in the area. She fought a guerrilla style war against the Spanish from 1809 to 1825. On March 8, 1816, her forces temporarily captured the Cerro Rico of Potosí, the main source of Spanish silver, also leading a cavalry charge that resulted in the capture of the enemy standard. For these actions she was promoted to Lieutenant Colonel on August 16, 1816, by Juan Martín de Pueyrredón, the Supreme Director of the United Provinces of the Río de la Plata at Buenos Aires. However, Shortly after Juana, who was expecting her fifth child, during a battle in November 1816, she was injured and her husband was killed while trying to save her, The body of her husband was hanged by the realists in the village of Laguna, and Juana found herself in a desperate situation: single, pregnant and with realistic armies effectively controlling the territory. After giving birth to a girl, she joined the guerrillas Martin Miguel de Guemes , which operated in northern Alto Peru. On the death of this leader guerrillas north dissolved, and Juana she was forced to malvivir in the region of Salta. at which she led a counterattack to recover the body of her husband. When the Spanish eventually counter-attacked in 1818, she fled with some of her soldiers to Northern Argentina where she continued to fight under the command of the Argentinean governor/guerrilla leader, General Martín Miguel de Güemes. She was appointed to the position of commander of patriotic Northern Army of the Revolutionary Government of the United Provinces of the Rio de la Plata. With this army she was able to establish an insurrection zone, until the Spanish forces withdrew from the area. She was so determined to the cause that she actually fought while she was pregnant, at one point, giving birth to her daughter, then returned to the fight soon after. At the highest point of her control, she commanded an army with an estimated strength of 6,000 men. After her military career was over she returned to Sucre (Chuquisaca), where she died on May 25, 1862. Throughout all the conflicts she lost her four sons and her husband, yet she continued to perform her duties until she retired and later died.

 

ZAPA-MAIN[1]

 

At the time of her death, she was forgotten and in poverty, but was remembered as a hero only a century later. She was awarded the rank of general of the Argentine Army in 2009. She also has “The National Programme for Women’s Rights and Participation” of Argentina is also named after her.

A 25-ton, 52-foot-high statue of Azurduy was created in Buenos Aires and unveiled July 15, 2015. It was commissioned by Bolivian president Evo Morales, and placed in the space where a statue of Columbus has stood. As of December 2015, months after its inauguration, it shows weathering damage.

A bas relief sculpture of Juana Azurduy was on display as part of an outdoor exhibition of famous Latin Americans on the grounds of the Pan American Union Building in Washington, DC in Spring 2014. Juana Azurduy is also the subject of a children’s cartoon designed to promote knowledge of Argentine history.

 

fahrenheit-e14413812767444456

womday-247x350

It’s not just racial tension; It’s White Supremacist Capitalist Imperialist Patriarchy! #BecomeUngovernable.

%d bloggers like this: